Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoker's saliva a 'cocktail of chemicals'
Yahoo ^ | 06/02/04 | Reuters

Posted on 06/02/2004 4:43:14 AM PDT by Colosis

LONDON (Reuters) - Smoking destroys protective molecules in saliva and transforms it into a dangerous cocktail of chemicals that increases the risk of mouth cancer, scientists say.

"Cigarette smoke is not only damaging on its own, it can turn the body against itself," said Dr Rafi Nagler, of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel.

Saliva contains antioxidants, molecules that normally protect the body against cancer, but Nagler and his colleagues have discovered that cigarette smoke destroys the molecules and turns saliva into a dangerous compound.

"Our study shows that once exposed to cigarette smoke, our normally healthy saliva not only loses its beneficial qualities but it turns traitor and actually aids in destroying the cells of the mouth and oral cavity," he added.

In research reported in the British Journal of Cancer on Wednesday, Nagler and his team studied the impact of cigarette smoke on cancerous cells in the laboratory.

Half of the cells were exposed to saliva exposed to cigarette smoke and the other half just to the smoke. Cells exposed to the saliva mixture had more damage and it increased along with the time of exposure.

"Most people will find it very shocking that the mixture of saliva and smoke is actually more lethal to cells in the mouth than cigarette smoke alone," Nagler added in a statement.

Smoking and drinking are the leading causes of head and neck or oral cancers, which includes cancer of the lip, mouth, tongue, gums, larynx and pharynx. Nearly 400,000 new cases of the illness are diagnosed worldwide each year with the majority in developing countries. The five-year survival rates are less than 50 percent.

Nagler and his colleagues believe the research could open up new avenues to develop better treatments to prevent oral cancer.

"This insight into how mouth cancer can develop offers more reasons for smokers to try and quit," said Jean King, of Cancer Research UK, which publishes the journal. "People know the link with lung cancer and this research adds compelling evidence about the damage smoking can do to the mouth."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: health; pufflist; smokers; smoking; smokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 901-905 next last
Maybe they should ban smokers, now that their saliva is a threat to us all.
1 posted on 06/02/2004 4:43:15 AM PDT by Colosis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Colosis

Probably not much worse than Monica Lewinsky's saliva.

 

2 posted on 06/02/2004 4:47:01 AM PDT by Fintan (Oh, who cares...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ping


3 posted on 06/02/2004 4:48:44 AM PDT by Born Conservative ("If everyone is thinking alike then somebody isn't thinking" - Gen. George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colosis
Smoking and drinking are the leading causes of head and neck or oral cancers,

Strange that they didn't say anything about the chemical interactions between cigarette smoke and liquor in the mouth. That combined with chemical changes in saliva could be very interesting.
4 posted on 06/02/2004 4:49:57 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colosis
Maybe they should ban smokers, now that their saliva is a threat to us all.

Maybe they should ban science, because it makes smokers feel bad about themselves emotionally. After all, that's what's important, right?

5 posted on 06/02/2004 4:52:12 AM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colosis

More scientific smoke bellowing from the scientific anus.


6 posted on 06/02/2004 4:57:47 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (Everything that really matters I learned from a song when I was 3. Jesus Loves Me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colosis

geez! it's a wonder smokers don't glow in the dark with all these contanimants they cause! Now they have "love canal" mouth!

what next? toxic seminal fluid?


7 posted on 06/02/2004 4:58:07 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it with something for you))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colosis
Nearly 400,000 new cases of the illness are diagnosed worldwide each year with the majority in developing countries.

Uh, hello you brainiac 'scientists'. I think you're overlooking the obvious here.
(what else is new, sheesh)

8 posted on 06/02/2004 5:01:56 AM PDT by Condor51 (Leftists Are Moral and Intellectual Parasites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Just another Joe; Gabz

In research reported in the British Journal of Cancer on Wednesday, Nagler and his team studied the impact of cigarette smoke on cancerous cells in the laboratory.

Half of the cells were exposed to saliva exposed to cigarette smoke and the other half just to the smoke. Cells exposed to the saliva mixture had more damage and it increased along with the time of exposure.



Seems to me that the conclusion is clearly that saliva causes cancer to accelerate! The saliva mixture being the key element and allllllllllllllllll!


9 posted on 06/02/2004 5:17:28 AM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

"Maybe they should ban science, because it makes smokers feel bad about themselves emotionally."

No matter how much junk science they use to try to accomplish this, they have failed and will continue to fail. Smokers aren't as wimpy as the anti-smoking nanny staters with oversensitive noses!


10 posted on 06/02/2004 5:19:57 AM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Colosis; Just another Joe

I read that article and had to go out and smoke and Benson & Hedges Light.


11 posted on 06/02/2004 5:20:03 AM PDT by Allegra (Meow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Smokers aren't as wimpy as the anti-smoking nanny staters with oversensitive noses!

True. Smokers are the addicts destroying themselves, but it's their right to slowly kill themselves if they so choose.

12 posted on 06/02/2004 5:26:29 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sakic

Eaters are killing themselves, but it's their right to slowly kill themselves!


13 posted on 06/02/2004 5:29:32 AM PDT by CSM (Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Maybe they should ban science, because it makes smokers feel bad about themselves emotionally. After all, that's what's important, right?

I think even smokers will admit that smoking is a rather idiotic habit to enjoy*, but so is a million other things that humans do - we shouldn't lose the right to be dumb@sses.

*I don't think it's as much about "enjoyment" as relief from withdrawels.

14 posted on 06/02/2004 5:29:41 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Colosis
Maybe they should ban smokers, now that their saliva is a threat to us all.

At least they should ban kissing a smoker..
15 posted on 06/02/2004 5:31:33 AM PDT by GROOVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

Your attempts to use logic with them won't work.

Any attempt to prove to them that smoking is unhealthy to them and to others is disregarded as junk science and you will be berated as an anti-smoking gnatzi in the process.

Only the reality of cancer will wake them up.


16 posted on 06/02/2004 5:38:11 AM PDT by TSgt (What have you done for your country today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Eaters are killing themselves, but it's their right to slowly kill themselves!

True, but eaters are also staying alive by eating even if what they eat may not always be healthy. We all gotta eat to survive.

Smokers are merely ingesting chemicals that shorten their lifespan and hurt their quality of life. I'm not saying they shouldn't have the right to do so.

17 posted on 06/02/2004 5:40:43 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MikeWUSAF
Only the reality of cancer will wake them up.

Or emphysema, or a stroke, or a heart attack, et al...

18 posted on 06/02/2004 5:41:32 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

You did not! Oh, man, now you're doomed . . . DOOMED!


19 posted on 06/02/2004 5:42:46 AM PDT by Xenalyte (It was nearly midnight before we scraped Uncle Harry off the dining-room table.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

They can't help it. They're junkies. Junkies don't think straight.


20 posted on 06/02/2004 5:44:52 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 901-905 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson